Are you a Judge in high Conflict family cases?
Do you have Cases with Allegation of Parental Alienation ?
This Cases Demands a Ekspert in Attachment Based Parental Alienation Assessment. Mental Violence and Child Psychological Abuse.
This pathology is complex, and differentiating it from current trauma is vitally important. That’s why children and families displaying this form of attachment-related pathology should receive the professional designation as a “special population” who require specialized professional knowledge and expertise to competently assess, diagnose, and treat.
The attachment system used by adolescents is seen as a “safety regulating system” whose main function is to promote physical and psychological safety. There are 2 different events that can trigger the attachment system.
Parental ALIENATION IT IS NOT A BUZZ WORD!
Parental Alienation is Mental Violence from a near relation, Child Psychological Abuse..DSM-5 diagnosis of V995.51 Child Psychological Abuse 309.4 Adjustment disorder V61.20 Parent Relationship Problem V61,29 Child Affected by Parental Relationship Distress V995,51 Child Psychological Abuse, confirmed.ICD 11 siger sådan her QE52,0 Caregiver relationship problem. DSM 5 CAPDR Child Affected By Parental Relationship Distress.. It need to be handle by a Criminal court,
A confirmed DSM-5 Diagnosis of the child Psychological Abuse Warrants the following Child Protection and Treatment response:
Child Response to a Protective Separation.
The child may initially respond to a protective separations from the currently allied parent
With increased protest behavior and defiance. This child response represents an emotional-behavioral tantrum reflecting the child’s currently over-empowered status relative to accepting authority (i.e. Both parental authority and the authority of the court). Responding to emotional display of the child tantrum behavior with calm and steady purpose that restores the child to an appropriate social and family hierarchy of cooperation with the court and parental authority will be important to supporting successful family therapy and the resolutions of the child’s symptoms. Any concern regarding the child’s expressed distress at the protective separation from the currently allied parent should recognize that the child’s fully capable of ending the proactive separation period by becoming non-symptomatic. If the child wishes a termination of the protective separation period, then the child simply needs to evidence normal-range affectional child behavior in response to the normal-range parenting practice’s of the Target Parent , which is under the treatment-related monitoring of the family therapist.
Ending the Protective Separation period
The protective separation period from the pathogenic and psychologically abusive parenting practice of the allied parent should be ended upon the successful treatment and resolution of the child’s symptoms and restoration of the child’s healthy and normal range development . The treating family therapist should seek courts approval to end the child’s protective separation from the pathogenic parenting practices of the currently allied parent based on the treatment-related gains achieved. Progress report to the parents and to the court from the treating family therapist should be provided at least every six months.